Collapse: The Blog

There Will Be No Race War

From Lawrence Auster, the story of yet another innocent white person murdered by a deranged black man:

This poor woman, Beverly Hope Melton, was on her way to pick up her grandmother for some shopping on the day after Christmas. She stopped by a convenience store in Jefferson, South Carolina, where a black savage named Nickolas Jermain Miller noticed her, then followed her in his car, drove her off the road, kidnapped her, drove her around to different locations, attempted repeatedly to rape her, then beat her to death with a baseball bat. Mrs. Melton called her grandmother from her car and told her she was being followed by a black man from the store. That was the last anyone heard from her.

The commenter Allan E. remarks:

There is such a rage that I felt in this story especially after seeing the photo gallery of her (just a young working-class Southern girl with her life and circle of family) and her smiling face in the store surveillance camera before her horrible end.

I can't believe I am alone in feeling the pressure building inside, the gnawing thought that this cannot go on much longer before Western man takes the law into his own hands.

Look, this is tragic and obscene and horrifying. I get it. And probably one in every ten leftist who reads this story will ask himself, "Ah, but was she a racist?", and that only compounds the outrage.

But there will not be a race war. Nor will there ever be substantial levels of white-on-black vigilante violence. Ever. Get it through your heads. You can bet that even if such rage and retaliation began to emerge, it would be immediately squelched with disproportionate police (even military) violence. The great sickening madness of it is that you would be choked to death by the bare hands of a white redneck Marine from South Carolina before modern society would ever permit you to enact denied justice against even a single "protected minority." These guys have shut up and gone along with every other leftist-mandated abomination, most recently the forced homosexualization of their own ranks against their own convictions. There is no floor here, no limit to how low the left will drag them.

White people have surrendered. Completely. In fact, a sizable portion of them are now actively your enemies and would cut your beating heart from your chest if they could do so without consequence. The rest don't care. Their main concern is not being seen as discriminatory. And if their children (preferably yours) have to be raped and tortured to death to achieve that, well, such is the price one pays for Progress, the blood-drinking god of our degenerate age.

This is the reason this is not a white nationalist blog. Many whites are actively in the service of evil: the rest are detestably weak, virtueless cretins who went along with evil because they thought it would buy them popularity. So much for that. You don't get to sell yourself into servitude for a nickel and then complain when your new master takes back the nickel.

This nightmare will end with the parousia, and not a second sooner.

This is Not a White Nationalist Blog

This blog's chief concerns are financial and economic collapse and the evils of the modern world.

The former are entirely the fault of white people: white people in the financial sector, white people in government, and a largely white electorate that didn't care about Ponzi schemes or financial rape until it stopped making them rich. Sure, black people have gone along with it (Jamie Dimon's genitals will forever bear Barack Obama's teethmarks), but they didn't innovate it and, Obama aside, are in no real position to put a stop to it.

The latter are almost entirely the fault of white people. Nearly everything horrible and/or stupid about the world today can be traced to some fat white jerk: Bentham, Hobbes, Hume, Locke, Marx, Nietzsche, etc. Nonwhites' contributions to modernity have been comparatively minimal, late in coming, and hardly innovative at all, mostly confined to trying to get a slice of the multicultural pie for themselves.

Now, I permit myself some sentimental affection for my race, which has accomplished really quite remarkable things in conditions of sometimes extraordinary adversity. And far be it from me to object to the particularist loyalties of others, within reason; anticosmopolitanism is imperfect but it's far preferable to the bland cultural leveling the left would foist on all of us. But I have to say that these affections do not and will not ever color the content of this blog. By and large, the people I identify as enemies here are almost exclusively white people. The West would still be dying and Christendom withering remorselessly even if not a single person of any other race had ever set foot within its borders. Aand even if every one of them magically vanished from the face of the earth, the modern project would march on as resolute as before.

Seriously, who's a greater menace? Take a moment to think about it. Is it the black guy from the inner city with the grill and the baggy pants who can barely read and will probably wind up in prison before he's even old enough to vote? Or is it the mild-mannered, white, middle-aged professor of sociology at the University of Minnesota who, over the course of a career, will contaminate the minds of 50,000 impressionable young students with androgynous, utilitarian, Marxist horseshit? The former may rob or rape or kill you, maybe, in a fit of desperation or bravado or madness. The latter will deliberately endeavor to consign the souls of several generations to eternal Hell, and congratulate himself for doing it -- and, let's not forget, he'll make you foot the bill for it.

Yet periodically I see white nationalist comments pop up in my control panel feed, or see traffic directed from white nationalist Web site. Guys, while I appreciate your continued readership, please don't misunderstand me: I'm not one of you. You're not just fighting a losing battle: you're fighting a pointless one. For one thing, you're fighting the wrong people. For another, your aims cannot even succeed until the modern zeitgeist is buried, which is what I aim to do.

So this is not, and will never be, a white nationalist blog. And in the interests of keeping the discussion oriented toward the proper enemies of civilization, I'm tweaking my editorial policy slightly. Henceforward, comments generally favorable toward white nationalist positions will be regarded with suspicion and likely not approved, and links to white nationalist Web sites will certainly be edited out.

Lest I be accused of kowtowing to leftists, no, that's not my agenda here (obviously). I just don't have the patience to deal with silliness. Don't waste your time, guys. And certainly don't waste mine.

Our Ongoing Collapse Opera: Flash Mobs and Alienation

I've noticed lately a sudden and dramatic surge in "wildings," essentially flash mobs that storm and rob stories and attack anyone that gets in their way, sometimes for apparently racial reasons. The news has been awash with reports of wildings lately, including recently, in Peoria, Illinois, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Washington, DC, Cleveland, Ohio, and various other cities. (The DC appears to be little more than a rowdy street brawl.)

I'm naturally suspicious of anything the media reports given that they are among the most staggeringly incompetent people employed anywhere today (and there's reason to believe that some reports may have been overhyped). But the possibility of incompetence can only cast doubts on one bad story, perhaps two; half a dozen in a few few weeks is conspicuous, and of course what I've cited above is only a small sampling of the number I've seen reports of in the last two months or so.

Let's assume, for a moment, that general instances of mob violence are on the rise nationwide, and that the reports are accurate that these flash mobs and flash robberies are largely racial in nature, or at least that the mobs are racially homogeneous (i.e., black). I'm not a conspiracy theorist so I doubt there's some sinister black-uprising conspiracy or something; rather, it's reasonable to assume that they are responses to some phenomenon that is relatively uniform across the country.

Naturally, I'm inclined to believe this is all tied to our ongoing social collapse. The ongoing deterioration of the American economy, and the resultant reduction in Americans' quality of living, is inculcating a sense of desperation in everyone (not juts blacks); and as national allegiance breaks down people are reverting to their baser passions of class and race. Blacks, being generally poorer on average than everyone else, get this effect doubly: their class identification is only amplified by their racial grievances (hence why wealthy, talented blacks who go to college to escape the miserable privations of the black subculture are demonized as "turning white").

Black Americans, I think, have always been more intimately bound up with the Society of Economic Man than whites ever were. Slavery, of course, exposed them to it directly, and upon their manumission, they came to see in that society a promise for equality and freedom that whites largely took for granted. Get rich or die tryin is a grim and perverse expression of that promise, which has been revealed as utterly, hopelessly hollow. Economic society, they believe now, can never really give them the freedom or the equality they yearn for. Thus, rising mob violence is, like the rise of totalitarian fascism, a reaction to the reality of collapse and the exposure of the vacuum beneath our decomposing social order. It is a protracted howl of despair and alienation, a plaintive elegy in the ongoing opera of our collapse.

Of course, I'm not trying to excuse such violence -- managing your despair and angst is your own responsibility, after all, no one else's, and those who try to do so by breaking the law deserve long prison terms -- but merely to understand it. And I think the best way to understand it is that blacks are maladapting to the unpleasant realities of modernity. White men kill themselves; black men kill each other (and sometimes others). We tend not to think of suicide the same way we think of criminal behavior and homicide but it seems to me that the distinction between self-oriented and other-oriented aggression is irrelevant to a corpse. In either case, the aggression is a form of rebellion against the appearance of injustice and irrationality of modern society. And it will persist, if not intensify, until and unless we succeed in once again endowing society with reason, order, and purpose.

Freakshow!

A not-so-unpredictable development in the McDonald's assault case I posted about yesterday. From The Smoking Gun:

The police report identifies the victim as 22-year-old Chrissy Lee Polis, who appears identical to Christopher Lee Polis, whose rap sheet includes convictions for disorderly conduct, property destruction, and prostitution, according to court records. The civil rights group Equality Maryland has identified the McDonald’s victim as a transgender woman.

I'd say that I hate to say I told you so, but I don't. Sooo... I told you so. (An aside: I really do hate the use of the phrase "transgender woman," though, because it's so ambiguous. Are they saying she's a woman now? Or was a woman previously? I guess ambiguity is rather the point for people who hate traditional gender roles and want to see them smashed).

There are an awful lot of omelette-faced white nationalists waking up this morning to the news that their beloved ivory-skinned princess-victim may well have a bigger cock than they do. Where the commenters at View from the Right and Citizen Renegade were quick to attempt to frame the attack as mindless black-on-white violence of the sort that characterizes pretty much every inner-city franchise restaurant, the truth was, as I suggested yesterday, a good deal more complicated.

Our "victim" was, in fact, a sexually deviant freakshow with a long and documented history of degeneracy who brought the can of whoop-ass on him/herself by insisting on using the women's restroom despite clearly possessing a Y chromosome. Naturally, the degenerates' lobby is leaping to the rescue (by which I mean the state's attorney's office):

A Baltimore LGBT group, called Equality Maryland, confirmed that the victim of the Baltimore McDonalds’ beating is a transgender woman. Lisa Polyak, vice president of the board of directors for Equality Maryland commented on the video. “It does appear that the victim was a transgender woman, and she was brutalized while people stood by and watched,” “There’s no excuse for that violence under any circumstances, but we would encourage police to investigate as a hate crime.” Equality Maryland called on state Attorney General Douglas F. Gansler to investigate the case as a hate crime.

Yeah, there's never any excuse for defending one's privacy and cultural values from weirdo perverts and the well-moneyed lobbyists who enable all their pathologies.

Mind you, I'm not on the black chicks' side here, either. As I said yesterday, "someone insisting on using the wrong bathroom is a case for giving that person a wide berth, avoiding that bathroom, calling the cops, and perhaps having a discreet punch-out in the loading bay behind the dumpsters later that night. It doesn't call for savagely ghetto-stomping that person into a seizure and apparently attempting to kidnap them." But it's certainly a lot more understandable when we see the violence as a reaction to an attempted intrusion into a private place set aside for women only (a place where they vacate their bowels for Heaven's sake!) by a gender-confused reprobate with a rap sheet. A gross overreaction fueled by their own mental instability and total lack of proportion, sure, but a reaction to an outrageous provocation nonetheless.

Being someone who's generally averse both to indiscrete, excessive violence and to the kinds of left-wing freaks who care so little about social norms that they'd actually intrude upon one of the most intensely personal spaces imaginable, I really can't say which side I detest more in this case. If anything good comes out of this internecine warfare between rival left-wing interest groups, it'll be that the LGBTBBQ-whatever lobby's role in encouraging such perversion ("you have a civil right to use any bathroom you want!") will be exposed and all their leaders will be shamed and hounded into a lonely suicide.

Unlikely, but a sane man can hope.

More on the Barbaric Generation (or, the Eternal War Between Blacks and Gays)

The big story on the Drudge Report today involves footage (obviously NSFW and, frankly, a bit nauseating) of three female McDonald's patrons (both black) assaulting a third (white) while employees, after a brief and half-hearted effort to split up the fight, retreat to the sidelines and watch. If you don't have the stomach to watch, here's a quick summary: the video begins after the fight has already started, with the three assaulters repeatedly stomping on the victim and dragging her by her hair around the restaurant and toward the front door. The only one to attempt intervention after the manager gives up is an elderly woman to whom the victim clings pathetically. The assaulters nearly manage to drag her out of the restaurant before the victim (apparently) begins to suffer a seizure; one of the employees tells the attackers to flee before the police arrive.

The assault is naturally being investigated from a hate crimes angle (again, the attackers were black and the victim white) but there appears to be something else going on entirely. The employee who shot the footage later claimed that the attack was not racially motivated but that the victim was, in fact, a cross-dressing man attempting to use the women's restroom who "got smart with everybody" after being told not to and who was beaten up as a result. He also claims the victim's seizure was faked.

Some thoughts:

1. First, check out last link above. What is it with lower-class African-Americans and Capitalizing Every Word In Every Sentence They Write? Hitting shift requires effort and it's not as if its socially unacceptable to write entirely in lower-case letters online anymore. What's the deal? (Yes, I know that's minutiae. Just getting the unimportant out of the way).
   
   
2. Do people really fake seizures to get out of a fight? That's not snark; I really don't know.
   
   
3. I'm actually partial to the employee's explanation. For one thing, check out the victim's proportions: they're all wrong for a woman. "She" is tall and slender, sure, but without hips, a flat back indicating the absence of anything like an ass, and no chest to speak of. "She" looks, in short, like a skinny dude dressed like a chick. (I could be wrong, of course; some women are unfortunately cursed with a lack of figure. But the employee's story matches the police's line: that the dispute involved use of the franchise's bathroom). Rosedale is exactly the kind of wealthy, mostly-white Baltimore suburb that would sport a weirdo transvestite degenerate, while simultaneously housing the kind of racial-tribalist ghetto thugs that would whallop him/her into a coma. It's one of the reasons why Maryland is one of the highest-crime states in the union, despite also being one of the wealthiest. I was born in and spent the first 25 years of my life in Maryland, and I can say with certainty that outside a few enclaves in the Western mountains and the eastern shore, the entire state is rife with the stench of tension between ghetto blacks in Baltimore and the poorer DC suburbs and weird-ass SWPL liberal whites everywhere else.
   
   
4. Assuming that the employee's story is accurate and that the victim was a transvestite whose belligerent insistence on using the women's bathroom led to the fight, I'm still torn on whose side to take here. On the one hand, people have a right to defend their privacy and their cultural values (which includes traditional gender roles and the segregation which they necessitate) against the cretinous, nihilistic, culture-destroying degenerates that plague the modern world; it's for this reason that, like Bonald at Throne and Altar, I'm A-OK with bullying under certain circumstances. On the other hand, someone insisting on using the wrong bathroom is a case for giving that person a wide berth, avoiding that bathroom, calling the cops, and perhaps having a discreet punch-out in the loading bay behind the dumpsters later that night. It doesn't call for savagely ghetto-stomping that person into a seizure and apparently attempting to kidnap them. American blacks' total lack of proportionality has always been one of my personal grievances against them: too many of them will fly into a violent rage at the slightest provocation, real or perceived, as has been amply documented recently. I suppose, in many ways, this is the logical conclusion of the most barbaric generation America has ever birthed: violent, hysterical black chicks from the slums beating the snot out of a creepy cross-dresser over who gets to use the women's bathroom in McDonald's while the only "men" in the building watch the scene unfold, cameraphones at the ready.

I guess this thin, mild-mannered white boy would love to see the authorities throw both victim and attackers in jail and lose the key. Or, preferably, the entire jail.

What do you think?

Suicide and Society

Simon Rierdon has a fascinating post over at In Mala Fide on the suicide epidemic currently ravaging the male sex throughout the Western world. I make a number of posts in the comments section.

A few things of note about the article, though -- we shouldn't be too alarmed that suicide is the third leading cause of death among young men (presumably in the United States, although the context of the quote makes it unclear). Young men are naturally dying at much lower rates of things like cancer or heart failure, so of course suicide is going to be more strongly represented as a cause of death among that age group. That said, suicide among young men is a growing problem, and one to be deeply worried about.

Simon and many of the posters tend to view this as through a gender relations prism. I see that as an important element, obviously -- suicide victims tend to be single, as do school-shooters and hostage-takers and so on -- but only as one important element. The corruption of gender relations that makes it impossible for ordinary, mild-mannered young men to find willing sexual partners, or to come through a divorce unbroken, is itself only one symptom of a larger problem. If there was something else available to which sexually unfulfilled men could direct their efforts, whether the pursuit of economic wealth or social accomplishment, I'm confident suicide rates would be much lower. But there isn't. Really, there's nothing. We're living in a collapsing society, and it's perfectly reasonable for a sensitively-dispositioned person to conclude that it's not worth living in, especially when it's made clear to him that he's not particularly welcome in it, anyway.

Suicide, at the end of the day, is just a particularly radical variant of the kind of social opting-out that men are already doing in large numbers. We don't want to get married because we'll be raked over the coals; we don't want to buy houses because we'll be ripped off by the banks; we don't want anything which society tells us is good because society has lied to us about everything.

Because the commenters tend to see the problem as one of gender relations, they see the solution as game. Game, of course, can solve the one problem (sexual unfulfillment), if you're at least modestly  good-looking, persistent, and socially competent. It can, as the commenters say, boost self-confidence, even if one fails at using it to attract sexual partners. In short, it can effectively manage an individual's despair at the collapse of the society around him by allowing him to indulge his sexual fancies with a parade of loose sluts.  But it cannot manage the despair of the masses, of society itself. And it thus cannot furnish a basis for the new social order that is desperately needed to survive the coming collapse.

Simon and at least one other commenter see the problem through a racial prism, as well. Certainly, there's a racial angle to it: white men commit suicide at rates far greater than women or racial minorities. But as I argue in the comments, suicide is just one way that people can maladjust to the social realities of our degenerate world -- blacks find other ways of doing it, namely, by murdering one another constantly. An entire generation of young black men has been devastated, killed or imprisoned or enslaved by drugs, and that this devastation is more or less entirely self-inflicted doesn't make it any less tragic. (Moreso, in fact, if you understand tragedy to refer, as in the classical sense, to the assignment of a person or group of people to a dark fate by virtue of some innate flaw).

In essence, we shouldn't delude ourselves that white people are the only ones suffering here. As I argue in the comments section of that post, there aren't any winners in social collapse. To borrow a phrase from one of my favorite movies, the only winning move is not to play. And that means finding a new basis for social order and building up the institutions to realize it before the house burns down around us and kills us all.